Legal Opinion
Cannell & Chaffin, Inc. v. Deering
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1921No. 1255PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Exceptions from Circuit Court First Circuit. Hon. J. T. DeBolt, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
KEMP, J.
This action in assumpsit was commenced October 19, 1917, under the. title Cannell, Smith, Chaffin Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff, v. C. W. C. Deering, Defendant, the Bank of Hawaii, Limited, a Corporation, Garnishee. The complaint is in two counts. Under the first count it is .alleged that on April 28, 1917, defendant was indebted *75to plaintiff in the sum of $3154 for divers goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered to him prior to that date. Annexed to the complaint as an exhibit and referred to in the body of the first count of the complaint is an…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Robbins v. Shelby County Taxing DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- L. Miller & Co. v. GoodmanTexas Supreme Court · 1897
- Cook v. Rome Brick Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Coit & Co. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- W. H. Lutes Co. v. WysongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eastern Iron & Metal Co. v. PattersonHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
- Atlas Elevator Co. v. Presiding Judge of the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1966
- Atlas Elevator Co. v. Presiding Judge of the Circuit CourtHawaii Supreme Court · 1966