Legal Opinion

Tate v. Golding

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 21, 1968No. 67SC19PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.

Plaintiff appellant’s assignments of error 1 through. 6 are to the action of the judge in allowing into evidence, over plaintiff’s objections, testimony of statements made by plaintiff to defendant. Plaintiff cites G.S. 8-45.5 in support of her objection. We have carefully considered these. assignments of error and, finding them without merit, they are overruled.

The appellant assigns as error four portions of the charge to the jury on the issue of contributory negligence. The following two portions are illustrative:

“The defendants assert that the plaintiff, herself, in driving a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Saunders v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Therrell v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mozingo v. Mid-South InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Clayton Ex Rel. Carter v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API