Mozingo v. Mid-South Insurance
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
VAUGHN, Judge.
Defendant brings forward several assignments of error wherein it contends, in essence, that the judge should not have submitted the case to the jury but should have entered judgment for defendant as a matter of law. These contentions cannot be sustained. The evidence tends to show that the insured met his death by external violence which was not totally inconsistent with an accident. The evidence tends to show that he met his death when a truck occupied by him [the parties seem to assume that inferences arising on the evidence are conclusive as to insured’s having been the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Saunders v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- American Credit Co. of Winston-Salem, Inc. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Tate v. GoldingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
3Cited by3 opinions
- Freeman v. Crown Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Collins v. Life Insurance Co. of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- Arch Specialty Insurance Company v. Ferster Electric, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2024