Bragg v. Danielson
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
This is an action on a promissory note, and- the defendant’s liability is not disputed, unless the following facts disclose a defence. The note was made for the accommodation of one Lewis, who, however, was not a party to it. When it fell due, the plaintiff agreed with the defendant, that, if the defendant would pay him another note for $225, made by the defendant, held by the plaintiff, and then due, “the plaintiff would undertake to see and would see Lewis and collect the note now sued upon from him, and release the defendant from liabilty thereon and deliver said note to him.” The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- President of the Michigan State Bank v. HastingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1844
- Allan v. Vanmeter's DeviseesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
- Hastings v. LovejoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Thorne v. DeasNew York Supreme Court · 1809
- Brightman v. HicksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- McLearn v. HillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Bourke v. CallananMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
- Hunt v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Martin v. MelesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Heard v. CalkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.