Legal Opinion
Stewart v. Roe
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 1, 1991No. 91 C 1991PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BUA, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Stewart has brought suit against Aurora police officers Kary Roe and Robin Trettenero; the Mayor of Aurora, David Pierce; and the City of Aurora claiming that they engaged in or sanctioned conduct that deprived him of his constitutional rights in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiff’s suit is based upon allegations of excessive force used by police officers of the Aurora police department. Specifically, plaintiff alleges that on April 4,1990, he was arrested and taken to the booking area of the Aurora Police Department. While in a holding cell,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Thomas Byrd v. William P. BrishkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
- Betty Lester v. City of Chicago, Officer Daniel Leahy, Officer Ernest Cain, and Sergeant John McNultyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Patricia A. Lyon v. James A. Whisman Whisman & Associates, P.A., Patricia A. Lyon v. James A. Whisman Whisman & Associates, P.A. James A. Whisman, Jr., Whisman & Associates, P.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Lyon v. WhismanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Bieros v. NicolaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1994
- Pyka v. Village of Orland ParkDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995