Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance & Perez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 19, 2012PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpain, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Nolan Jr., J), entered June 8, 2011 in Saratoga County, which granted petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR 7503 to permanently stay arbitration between the parties.
While insured by petitioner under a supplementary uninsured/ underinsured (hereinafter SUM) policy in the amount of $100,000 per person, respondent was injured in a rear-end motor vehicle collision. The alleged tortfeasor maintained an insur*1315anee policy that provided liability coverage in the amount of $25,000. Respondent sent two letters to petitioner, the first notifying it of his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TaglianettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- State Farm Automobile Insurance v. BlancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Del PizzoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bernstein v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Hertz Claim Management Corp. v. KulakowichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ducz v. Progressive Northeastern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Ducz v. Progressive Northeastern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Warner v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Warner v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012