Legal Opinion
Exom v. Brock & Scott, PLLC
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 23, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00773Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 AZIZA EXOM, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00773-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order Granting Brock & Scott, PLLC’s Motion to Dismiss 5 v. [ECF No. 8] 6 BROCK & SCOTT, PLLC, 7 Defendant 8 Plaintiff Aziza Exom sues Brock & Scott, PLLC for violating the Fair Debt Collection 9 Practices Act (FDCPA) by garnishing her Nevada wages without domesticating the judgment in 10 Nevada. Brock moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and failure to state a claim, 11 arguing that all of its activities in this case took place in Tennessee. Exom responds that Brock 12…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Boschetto v. HansingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- K. Morrill v. Scott Financial Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.