Legal Opinion

Gilmartin v. Stevens Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1953No. 32309Published

1Opinion of the Court

43 Wn.2d 289 (1953)

261 P.2d 73

MARIE GILMARTIN et al., Appellants,

v.

STEVENS INVESTMENT COMPANY, Respondent.[1]

No. 32309.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

September 21, 1953.

Arthur H. Hutchinson and Kenneth L. Johnson, for appellant.

Russell B. Johnson, for respondent.

HAMLEY, J.

Did the trial court, after finding that plaintiffs had sustained substantial damage, err in allowing them nominal damages only, and in denying them a new trial on the question of damages?

On November 22, 1948, Marie Gilmartin and her husband, A.F. Gilmartin, purchased from Stevens Investment Co., Inc., a certain…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Weaver; Concurrence · Mallery; Concurrence · Donworth; Per curiam.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Gaasland Co. v. Hyak Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. National School Studios, Inc. v. Superior School Photo Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Gilmartin v. Stevens Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Ball v. Stokely Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API