Legal Opinion

Gilmartin v. Stevens Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1953No. 32309PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamley, J.

Did the trial court, after finding that plaintiffs had sustained substantial damage, err in allowing them nominal damages only, and in denying them a new trial on the question of damages?

On November 22,1948, Marie Gilmartin and her husband, A. F. Gilmartin, purchased from Stevens Investment Co., Inc., a certain tract of land in Island county, state of Washington. Twenty months later, the Gilmartins brought this action against the vendor. They alleged that Stevens Investment Company had breached covenants of the real-estate *291contract which obligated the vendor ■ to construct certain sewer…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Gaasland Co. v. Hyak Lumber & Millwork, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. National School Studios, Inc. v. Superior School Photo Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Larson v. Union Investment & Loan Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Ball v. Stokely Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Dunseath v. HallauerWashington Supreme Court · 1953

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Jacqueline's Washington, Inc. v. Mercantile Stores Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Ford v. Trendwest Resorts, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Riblet v. Spokane-Portland Cement Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Jacob's Meadow Owners Ass'n v. PLATEAU 44Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API