Keturi v. Keturi

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Troy Keturi appeals several legal and factual findings made by the standing master and adopted by the superior court in connection with his divorce trial. We conclude that the superior court did not err in aggregating his past income for child support purposes, in finding that his earning potential would not be adversely affected by his physical eondi tion in the immediate future, in characterizing a triplex held in Troy’s name as marital property, or in determining there to be no debt on a duplex owned as marital property. We therefore affirm the…