Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided May 4, 1918No. 7964PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error from Dallas County Court; T. A. Work, Judge. Action by Charles E. Bowman against -J. W. Bailey and others. Directed verdict for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtBainey, C. J.
We adopt the statement of the case from defendants in error’s brief as follows:
“Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, on the 19th day of February, 1916, filed this suit in the county court of Dallas county, at law, Dallas county, Tox. He sues, for himself and as the assignee and legal representative of G. C. Wood, the defendants in error, J. W. Bailey, Charles Mott, N. E. Harper, and B. L. Walkup, both as individuals and as a partnership under the name Dallas Loan Company, for twice $70,-15, alleged to have been paid defendants in error as usurious interest by G. C. Wood, and which claim for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rosetti v. LozanoTexas Supreme Court · 1902
- Southern Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. WinansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- North Texas Building & Loan Ass'n v. HayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
- Long v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Stewart v. BriggsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Haney v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Schmidt v. Citizens Industrial Bank of AustinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935