Legal Opinion

Roe-Lawton v. Hal E. Roach Studios

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 7, 1927PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

Plaintiff by this suit seeks to recover damages and to have equitable relief against the defendants, who are motion-picture producers. Infringement of copyright covering literary material embodied in a series of five stories, published in a weekly journal of national character in October, 1915, February, 1916, October, 1916, June, 1917, and February, 1918, is claimed. They were stories in which the wild horse supplied the motive; the underlying theme being the power of the human to subdue and win the affection of the animal.

The' defendant, Roach Studios, in 1924 and 1925…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dymow v. BoltonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. Stephens v. Howells Sales Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
  3. Bachman v. BelascoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Harold Lloyd Corporation v. WitwerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Nutt v. National Institute Incorporated for the Improvement of MemoryCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  4. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. National Broadcasting Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1955
  5. Becker v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API