Legal Opinion

Anspec Co., Inc. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 25, 1989No. 2:89-cv-71165PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, District Judge.

This case is currently before the Court on the motion of defendants Johnson Controls, Inc., Hoover Universal, Inc. and Hoover Group, Inc., to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on two separate grounds. First, defendants claim that plaintiffs have failed to state a federal claim upon which relief can be granted. Secondly, defendants allege that this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ state law claims.

FACTS

Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint seeks recovery for costs incurred by plaintiffs in order to clean up chemical…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wehner v. Syntex Agribusiness, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. The Anspec Company, Inc. And Hugh Montgomery v. Johnson Controls, Inc., Hoover Universal, Inc., Hoover Group, Inc. And Ultraspherics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. DistlerDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1990
  3. Haynes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Avondale Industries, Incorporated and Ogden Corporation v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, Defendant-Third-Party v. Commercial Union Insurance Company, Highlands Insurance Company, American Motorists Insurance Company, and National Union Fire Insurance Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Kempf v. City of Lansing (In Re Diamond Reo Trucks, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API