People Ex Rel. Lamm v. Banta
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges
This action, in the nature of quo warranto, was instituted in this court to resolve a dispute as to which group of respondents is lawfully entitled to hold positions of commissioner on the Colorado Highway Commission. The respondents are grouped and designated as “incumbent commissioners” and “interim appointees” solely for the purpose of distinguishing between them when they are referred to in this opinion.
We assume original jurisdiction in this case because it involves constitutional issues of compelling and urgent public importance. The resolution of this dispute by this court is necessary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- People v. TiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- People v. OsborneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1884
- State Ex Rel. McCarthy v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- State Board of Education v. Commission of FinanceUtah Supreme Court · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. BlehmSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
- Romanoff v. State Commission on Judicial PerformanceSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- Yellow Jacket Water Conservancy District v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1984
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.