Legal Opinion

Vitug v. Multistate Tax Commission

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 27, 1995No. 93 C 5357PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASPEN, District Judge.

The court approves and adopts the March 24, 1995 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Martin C. Ashman. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees is denied and defendants’ motion for bill of costs is allowed. In lieu of filing objections, a motion for reconsideration with supporting brief may be filed within ten days of this order.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ASHMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

On January 21, 1994, plaintiff, Joselito Vi-tug (“Vitug”), filed a two-count first amended complaint seeking damages from defendants, Multistate Tax Commission…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tiara Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Marsh USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010
  2. Baaske v. City of Rolling MeadowsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Assicurazioni Generali, S.P.A.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1995
  4. Fox v. ViceDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2010
  5. Simmons v. Village of MinierDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API