Aid Insurance Co. (Mutual) v. Chrest
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Justice.
The question here concerns issue preclusion. Plaintiff Aid Insurance Company sought a declaratory judgment that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its insured Wesley Marvin Chrest in an action brought by Frederick D. Herman against Chrest arising from a shooting incident at Chrest’s home. AID’s homeowners policy excluded coverage for bodily injury “which is either expected or intended from the standpoint of the Insured.” After trial of the declaratory judgment action, a jury returned special verdicts finding that the injury to Herman was neither expected nor intended by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Burd v. Sussex Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Hunter v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. v. WinkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Lacinda Ranee Van HaaftenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State v. KlawonnSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Israel v. Farmers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Dettmann v. KruckenbergSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.