Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. S & R, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1977No. 10019PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Associate Judge.

This appeal arises from an order of the Superior Court granting defendant-appel-*169lee’s motion for summary judgment on a complaint for trespass — wrongful repossession of an automobile. The effect of the ruling was to hold lawful the repossession in the District of Columbia under a Maryland garageman’s lien. Appellant O’Donnell concedes that Maryland law created a valid lien in favor of appellee, but argues that this lien could have no effect outside Maryland. Thus, repossession of his car in the District of Columbia pursuant to the lien was unlawful. We affirm the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Associates Discount Corporation v. HeldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  3. Bullock v. YoungDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. General Finance & Thrift Corp. v. GuthrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Jackson v. ShuttleworthAppellate Court of Illinois · 1963

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Headspeth v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API