Legal Opinion

Headspeth v. Mercedes-Benz Credit Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1998No. 96-CV-641PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAGNER, Chief Judge:

Appellant, Leroy B. Headspeth, appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment for appellees, Mercedes-Benz Credit Corporation (MBCC) and Laurel Adjustment Bureau, Inc. (LAB). The controversy arises out of MBCC’s repossession of a vehicle Headspeth purchased under a retail installment sales contract after Head-speth defaulted in payments. Headspeth argues for reversal on the ground that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment against him because a disputed issue of fact exits concerning whether MBCC’s agent, LAB, trespassed into a fenced area…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brunswick Corporation v. J & P, Inc., an Oklahoma Corporation, Lucille Greer and Jack GreerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
  2. Wallace v. Chrysler Credit Corp.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1990
  3. Cottam v. HeppnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Seven Day Builders of Arkansas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Oaklawn Bank v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of DanielDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Valentine v. ElliottDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API