Clear Creek Transp., Inc. v. Peebles
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This case addresses the meaning of the term "rehabilitation" in § 25-5-57(a)(4)d, Ala. Code 1975, which states that "[a]ny employee whose disability results from an injury or impairment and who shall have refused to undergo physical or vocational rehabilitation or to accept reasonable accommodation shall not be deemed permanently and totally disabled." The trial court rejected the employers' argument that "rehabilitation," for purposes of that statute, may consist solely of a former employer locating one or more jobs that the former employer contends the employee is capable of performing. We…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- Terry v. Read Steel ProductsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Slagle v. Reynolds Metals Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Ex Parte Alabama Ins. Guar. Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Ex Parte Phenix Rental CenterSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sims v. American Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Saad's Healthcare Services, Inc. v. MeinhardtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2007
- Meinhardt v. SAAD'S HEALTHCARE SERVICESCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2006
- Saad's Healthcare Services, Inc. v. MeinhardtSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Clear Creek Transp., Inc. v. PeeblesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.