Legal Opinion
Clear Creek Transp., Inc. v. Peebles
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided June 30, 2004No. 2020556Published
1Opinion of the Court
911 So.2d 1059 (2004)
CLEAR CREEK TRANSPORTATION, INC., and Skilstaf, Inc.
v.
Harold PEEBLES.
2020556.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
June 30, 2004.
Rehearing Denied December 30, 2004.
Certiorari Denied May 6, 2005.
Wallis S. Haynes, Birmingham, for appellants.
Thomas B. Denham, Moulton, for appellee.
Alabama Supreme Court 1040524.
MURDOCK, Judge.[1]
This case addresses the meaning of the term "rehabilitation" in § 25-5-57(a)(4)d, Ala.Code 1975, which states that "[a]ny employee whose disability results from an injury or impairment and who shall have refused to undergo physical or vocational…
Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ex Parte Trinity Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- IMED Corp. v. Systems Engineering Assoc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
- DeKalb County LP Gas Co., Inc. v. Suburban Gas, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Edwards v. Jesse Stutts, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.