Legal Opinion

Bierman v. Target Corporation

District Court, D. Nevada

Decided September 29, 2024No. 2:22-cv-01044Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * * 7 CATHERINE BIERMAN, Case No. 2:22-cv-01044-RFB-NJK 8 Plaintiff, ORDER 9 v. 10 TARGET CORPERATION, 11 Defendant. 12 13 Before the Court is the Motion for Summary Judgement (ECF No. 25) of Defendant Target 14 Corporation (“Target”). For the following reasons, the Court grants the motion. 15 16 I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 17 The Court finds the following facts to be undisputed. On June 15, 2020, at approximately 18 6:30 p.m., Plaintiff Catherine Bierman fell in at a store owned by Target. A substance was on the 19 ground in the middle…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Juan Albino v. Lee BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  4. Victoria Zetwick v. County of YoloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  5. Gonzalez Ex Rel. Gonzalez v. City of AnaheimCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API