Legal Opinion

DeCook v. Bruno G.M.C. Truck Sales Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 18, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously modified by granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint; as so modified, affirmed without costs.

After receipt of a 90-day demand pursuant to CPLR 3216, plaintiff failed to comply by either moving to restore the case before the expiration of the 90-day period, or moving to vacate the notice or to extend the 90-day period. Moreover, plaintiff failed to provide a reasonable excuse to justify the delay in responding to the demand. Accordingly, defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint should have been granted. Contrary to plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lopez v. Imperial Delivery Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. Basetti v. NourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Attilio v. GladstoneCivil Court of the City of New York · 1997
  4. Cascio v. O'DalyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chavez v. 407 Seventh Avenue Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2005
  2. Ubillus-Tambini v. IschakovAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API