Legal Opinion

Attilio v. Gladstone

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 19, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*760OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard Tolchin, J.

Motion by defendant Gladstone seeking summary judgment and dismissal of the complaint as against him is decided as follows:

Pursuant to the undisputed facts as set forth in the amended summons and complaint dated January 20, 1997, on February 26, 1994 plaintiff was a passenger in a motor vehicle operated by defendant Scates and owned by defendant Nicastri. While travelling on the Triboro Bridge in the Queens-bound lane, the Nicastri automobile, in which plaintiff was a passenger, came into contact with defendant Gladstone’s vehicle when the Nicastri car…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Barnes v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. Auger v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Bono v. BarzalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. DeCook v. Bruno G.M.C. Truck Sales Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2002
  4. Ubillus-Tambini v. IschakovAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API