Legal Opinion

State v. Arles

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1999No. 22413PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge.

David Arles (defendant) was convicted, following a jury trial, of the class D felony of possession of pseudoephedrine with the intent to manufacture methamphetamine, a controlled substance. § 195.420. 1 He appeals contending, among other things, that there was not sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror could find beyond a reasonable doubt that he was guilty of the offense with which he was charged. This court agrees. The judgment of conviction is reversed. Defendant is ordered discharged.

On December 9, 1997, defendant and Debra Cox were shopping at a Wal-Mart…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. State v. MorrowMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. State v. MarvelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kotila v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. MickleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. AgeeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. LubbersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. State v. RollettMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API