Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Taylor

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 2015No. 2014-SC-000211-DGPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

JUSTICE NOBLE

Under Simmons v. United, States, 390 U.S. 377, 88 S.Ct. 967, 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968), and Shull v. Commonwealth, 475 S.W.2d 469 (Ky.1971), a criminal defendant’s testimony at a suppression hearing may not be used as evidence of guilt at trial without violating his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination if he objects to its use. In-'this- case, the defendant did not object, and the testimony was used against him. The Court of Appeals nevertheless concluded that a palpable error had occurred and reversed the conviction. Is the requirement of an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. United States v. MoniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Lanham v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Bartley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Michael Lehman v. Commonwealth of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API