Dederick v. Cassell
United States Circuit Court
Hearing on Bill, Answer, and Proof. Bill for injunction against infringement of reissues of patents issued to complainant for improvements in baling-presses. The answer denied novelty, alleged that the reissues contained “new matter,” and denied infringement. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Butler, D. J.
The suit embraces seven patents, for “improvements in baling-presses,” numbered 8,130, 8,316, 7,983, 8,312, 8,292, 8,296, and 187,220. The last named, however, the plaintiff has withdrawn.
*307The first and second are reissues derived from original 132,566, dated October 29, 1872; the third and fourth are reissues derived from original 132,639, of same date as 132,566 ; the fifth is a reissue of original 151,477, dated June 2, 1874, and the sixth a reissue of original 177,216, dated May 9, 1876. As the case now stands the respondent is charged with infringing 22 claims, being the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. StimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- The Corn-Planter PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Gill v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Gould v. ReesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- National Folding-Box & Paper Co. v. ElsasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- American Soda-Fountain Co. v. GreenU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1896