People v. Sharp
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMarilyn Kelly, J.
I concur in part and dissent in part.
Although defendant’s sentence should be affirmed, I would remand to strike any suggestion in the presentence report that defendant’s attack was not provoked. Moreover, I disagree with the new waiver rules created by the majority regarding challenges to inaccurate presentence reports and to disproportionate sentences.
At the guilty plea proceeding, after defendant pled guilty, defense counsel informed the court that the victims in the case may have taunted *507defendant prior to the stabbings. Defense counsel also stated that defendant had decided not to pursue…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. BettisteaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. HoytMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. WigginsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. MaxsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.