Legal Opinion

Peter Adams Co. v. National Shoe & Leather Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by the Peter Adams Company against the National Shoe & Leather Bank, Theodore Conrow, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The plaintiff delivered its cheek, drawn on the 29th of October, 1884, for the sum of $4,500, to A. C. Branscom, representing himself to be the manager of the publishing department of the New Orleans Exposition. This check was drawn upon the Nassau Bank, and was received by Branscom upon a note of $5,500, dated on the 19th of August, 1884. This note was made in the name of the Mississippi Mills, and had the name of William M. Oliver, “secretary” and “treasurer” subscribed to it. The plaintiff was a manufacturer and dealer in paper, a large quantity of which was contracted for, and to be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. &198tna National Bank v. . Fourth National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Village of Port Jervis v. . First National B'k.New York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Newton v. . PorterNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Stephens v. . Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  5. Justh v. . Nat. B'k of the CommonwealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Bryant v. Century BankNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Miller v. Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API