Legal Opinion

People v. Tittlebach

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 17, 2001No. 2 — 99—1266PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Byrne

Following a bench trial, respondent, John Tittlebach, was adjudicated to be a sexually violent person pursuant to the Sexually Violent Persons Commitment Act (the Commitment Act) (725 ILCS 207/1 et seq. (West 1998)). On appeal, respondent argues that (1) the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a sexually violent person; (2) the trial court failed to provide a statutorily required hearing prior to ordering respondent committed to a secure facility; and (3) his commitment was unconstitutional because the trial court did not specifically find that he lacked volitional…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. HoweryIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In Re Detention of SamuelsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  2. In Re Detention of LiebermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. In Re Detention of ErbeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  4. In re Commitment of FieldsIllinois Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Martin v. SallyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API