Legal Opinion

Glover v. Bausch & Lomb, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 7, 2022No. SC20607Published

1Opinion of the Court

MARJORIE GLOVER ET AL. v. BAUSCH & LOMB, INC., ET AL. (SC 20607) Robinson, C. J., and McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the Connecticut Product Liability Act (CPLA) (§ 52-572q (a) and (d)), a product seller may be subject to liability for harm caused to an individual who proves that the product was defective insofar as adequate warnings or instructions were not provided, and the product seller may not be considered to have provided adequate warnings or instructions unless they were devised to communicate with the person or entity best able to take or…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Brooks v. Mentor WorldwideCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  5. In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API