Lynch v. Rank
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, District Judge.
The Pickle Amendment to the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(note), was designed “to insure that an increase intended to benefit the aged and disabled would not have inadvertent harmful effects.” S.Rep. No. 94-1265, 94th Cong., 2d Sess. 28 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.Code Cong. & Ad.News 5997, 6022. Congress intended the Amendment to nullify the detrimental effect of social security cost-of-living increases on certain recipients’ eligibility for Medicaid benefits; such increases raised the recipient’s countable income level beyond the qualifying…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MendozaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Schweiker v. Gray PanthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Califano v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Charles L. JORDAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sherman v. GriepentrogDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1991
- 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Miller v. CarlsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1991
- Darling v. BowenDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1988
- Lynch v. RankDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.