Legal Opinion
Lynch v. Rank
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 18, 1985No. C-83-2340 WHOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ORRICK, Senior District Judge.
This case comes before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion to have Mr. Keith Putnam, the Assistant Director of the Oregon Department of Human Resources, held in contempt for his failure to take certain action to bring Oregon into compliance with a previous order of this Court. The issue of law presented by the motion is whether the Court has personal jurisdiction over Mr. Putnam. For the reasons stated below, the Court finds it does not have jurisdiction and, therefore, denies the motion.
I
Certain background information is essential to understanding…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Data Disc, Incorporated v. Systems Technology Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alemite Mfg. Corporation v. StaffCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, and v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc., AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Reebok International Ltd. v. McLaughlinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1993
- 18 soc.sec.rep.ser. 65, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,369 Raymon and Joann Lynch v. William Dawson, Defendants-Third Party and Otis Bowen, M.D., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987