Legal Opinion
Hrisomalos v. Smith
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 19, 1992No. 53A05-9201-CV-7PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.
On January 2, 1991, Mare and Beth Smith, who wished to purchase lots Nos. 7 and 8 located on the southern edge of Bloomington's Hillsdale First Addition ("Hillsdale") in order to operate a dentist's office, filed a complaint for declaratory judgment asking that a restrictive covenant benefiting the Hillsdale subdivision be declared invalid with respect to lots Nos. 7 and 8. Minnette Deiss, the owner of the lots, later joined in the Smiths' petition. (Petitioners will be referred to collectively as "Smiths") Frank N. Hrisomalos, Athena R. Hrisomalos, Dennis L. Friesel,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cowling v. ColliganTexas Supreme Court · 1958
- Donavan v. Ivy Knoll Apartments PartnershipIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Wischmeyer v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Johnson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Burnett v. HeckelmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cavens v. ZaberdacIndiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Johnson v. DawsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Holliday v. Crooked Creek Villages Homeowners Assoc., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Bagko Development Co. v. DamitzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Corner v. MillsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.