Legal Opinion
Burnett v. Heckelman
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 14, 1983No. 1-483A107PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RATLIFF, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In an action initiated by Mary Heckelman to have certain restrictive covenants pertaining to her property declared unenforceable, the Clark Superior Court granted judgment in her favor. Various adjoining landowners who had opposed Heckelman in the lower court proceedings now appeal.
We reverse.
FACTS 1
In June of 1955, Heckelman, together with her husband and his parents, 2 purchased five lots in the Beechwood Manor Subdivision in Clarksville, Indiana. While Mary and her husband originally intended to build several houses on these lots, none were ever erected…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Trinity Lutheran Church, Inc. of Evansville v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. of Indianapolis v. H.L.C. Enterprises, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Arnold v. DirrimIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- James v. Brink & Erb, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Bachman v. Colpaert Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1935
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lucas v. FrazeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Williams v. RogierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Columbia Club, Inc. v. American Fletcher Realty Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Campbell v. SpadeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- McClamroch v. McClamrochIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.