G.W.E. v. R.E.Z.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION BY
MUNDY, J.:
I respectfully dissent from the learned Majority’s decision to affirm the trial court’s order in this case. Based on my review of the record, I conclude that Appellant met the required threshold under section 339(a) of the Restatement.
As noted by the Majority, Appellant invokes section 339 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts, which states as follows.
§ 339 Artificial Conditions Highly Dangerous to Trespassing Children
A possessor of land is subject to liability for physical harm to children trespassing thereon caused by an artificial condition upon the land if(a)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Yeske v. Avon Old Farms School, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1983
- Gregory v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Hill v. National GridSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Hofer Ex Rel. Hofer v. MeyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.