Legal Opinion

Central Construction Co. v. Home Indemnity Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1990No. S-3486PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This petition arises out of a dispute between The Home Indemnity Company (Home) and CMOG 1 over the handling of an insurance claim. CMOG sought discovery of certain documents from Home in connection with CMOG’s counterclaim. Home refused to fully comply with CMOG’s discovery request, asserting that the documents fall within the attorney-client privilege.

The superior court denied CMOG’s motion to compel discovery. It held that CMOG must make a prima facie showing that Home committed civil fraud before CMOG could overcome Home’s claim of privilege.

CMOG petitioned for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Moloso v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Fellerman v. BradleySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Alaska Interstate Construction, LLC v. Pacific Diversified Investments, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Harris Management, Inc. v. Paul CoulombeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016
  3. State v. United Cook Inlet Drift AssociationAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Mogg v. National Bank of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Freedom Trust v. Chubb Group of Ins. CompaniesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API