Heindel v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONS, Circuit Judge.
While there were two appeals the appellants had been jointly indicted and, in a single trial, convicted and sentenced for attempting to defeat and evade income and excess profits taxes of the Cincinnati Lathe & Tool Company, a corporation, of which they were officers and employees, by swearing to and filing a false return of the net income of that corporation for the calendar year 1940. They were also charged, convicted, and sentenced for conspiring in an attempt to defeat and evade such taxes.
It is disclosed by the evidence that the Cincinnati Lathe & Tool Company was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. CallusSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Emmich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
- Third Nat. Bank v. SchattenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Hancey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. StoehrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- George Kohatsu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- I. C. Turner and E. v. Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- United States v. RaubCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- United States v. StoehrDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.