Lively v. HANAGAN BROS.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtWiltrout, J.
— This is an action for wrongful death, brought by appellant against appellee. Trial resulted in a verdict of the jury for appellee, and judgment was rendered accordingly.
At the outset the appellee contends that by reason of deficiencies in briefing appellant presents no question for our consideration. While we do not approve the form of appellant’s brief in its entirety, it is apparent that a good faith effort has been made to comply with the applicable rules. The court is able to understand the question presented, and in our opinion the brief of appellant is sufficient for a determination…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCague v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
- Allman v. MalsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- Mishler v. Chicago, South Bend & Northern Indiana RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Cochran v. WimmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1948
- Lively v. HANAGAN BROS.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by4 opinions
- Trinity Universal Insurance v. Town of SpeedwayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Barrett v. StoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Barrett v. StoneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
- Lively v. HANAGAN BROS.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1950