Lively v. HANAGAN BROS.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion
*507ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Wiltrout, J.
— Appellant in her petition for rehearing insists that we erred in holding that no objection was made to appellee’s instruction No. 13 as modified. We find a statement in the special bill of exceptions that appellant stated and dictated her specific objection to appellee’s tendered instruction No. 13 as tendered by the appellee, and as modified by the court in the form in which it was given. The objection set forth is that: “The plaintiff objects to defendant’s tendered instruction number thirteen for the reason that ‘sober man’ does not indicate a legal…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Lively v. HANAGAN BROS.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1950