United Farm Workers of America v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge NOONAN; Dissent by Judge PREGERSON.
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
A single issue is presented by this case: Was an appeal from a decision of the Environmental Protection Agency (the EPA) filed in the right court? In the background are the merits of the litigation centered on the continued use of the pesticide Azinphos-Methyl (AZM). Our task is not to decide the merits but to ascertain the appeals process established by Congress. We hold that the choice of the district court by United Farm Workers of America and the other appellants (collectively Farm Workers) was mistaken and that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- The Humane Society of the United States v. Environmental Protection Agency, Lee M. Thomas, Administrator of the Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pesticide Action Network North America v. U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Reckitt Benckiser Inc. v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
- Defenders of Wildlife v. JacksonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- National Family Farm Coalition v. UsepaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Center for Biological Diversity v. Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.