Cox v. Cline
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Johnson District Court.— How. R. P. Howell, Judge. ActioN upon a promissory note. Judgment for defendants and plaintiff appeals.—
1Opinion of the Court
Weaver, J.—
Tbe note in suit was given for tbe purchase price of a stallion. Tbe defendants resisted payment on tbe ground that tbe note was procured by fraud, and that plaintiff is not a bona fide bolder. Tbe cause was twice tried in tbe court below; a verdict for defendants being returned in each instance.
I. In its charge to tbe jury the trial court, after stating tbe issues, proceeded as follows:
*130Seventh. The burden is first npon the plaintiff to establish that he is now the owner of the note sued npon, that he acquired the same in the ordinary course of business and before the same was due,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Goldthorp v. GoldthorpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Lathrop v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- Bank of Bushnell v. Buck Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Anthon State Bank v. BernardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Waukee Savings Bank v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.