Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Malcolm

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 16, 2015No. 2013-04172Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hinds-Radix, J.,

concurs in part and dissents in part, and votes to modify the judgment, on the law, by reducing the defendant’s conviction of grand larceny in the fourth degree to petit larceny, and vacating the sentence imposed on that count, and as so modified, to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: The defendant stands convicted of grand larceny in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 155.30 [1]) relating to three instances of shoplifting from a Home Depot store occurring on August 5, 2012, August 13, 2012, and August 20, 2012, respectively. His conviction is based upon a theory…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. CoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. People v. DaghitaNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  3. People v. BastianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. RosichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API