Solis v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for attempted capital murder. The appellant urges four points of error on appeal. We find them without merit and therefore affirm.
Appellant’s first ground of error contends that the trial court should have quashed his indictment because it failed to allege attempted capital murder. The relevant part of the indictment reads:
ROMEO ROMAN SOLIS ... did then and there with the specific intent to commit the offense of murder, intentionally and knowingly attempt to cause the death of an individual, NOE GARZA, a peace officer, by shooting…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tarpley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Pitts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Murphy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Sartain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Edwin Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Edwin Delamora v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Sartain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.