Shelton Electric Co. v. Victor Talking Mach. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
At Law. Action by the Shelton Electric Company against the Victor Talking Machine Company to recover treble damages by reason of an alleged unlawful restraint of trade.
1Opinion of the Court
BODINE, District Judge.
The present action is brought to recover damages by reason of an alleged unlawful restraint of trade. The complaint contains two counts. The first charges that certain specific acts have been done “contrary to and in contravention of the anti-trust laws of the United States,” and the concluding clause demands treble damages in addition to the attorneys’ fees and costs, “as authorized by law in such case made and provided.”
The second count contains no reference to the anti-trust laws of the United States or to’the provisions of the laws of the United States. As to the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Call Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Outwater v. City of PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
3Cited by20 opinions
- Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
- Christensen v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1951
- Baush MacH. Tool Co. v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Reid v. Doubleday & Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1952
- Wolf Sales Co. v. Rudolph Wurlitzer Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1952
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.