Legal Opinion

Chanowsky v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 18, 1949No. 15018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

In 1936, Minnie Friedman obtained judgment against Jake Chanowsky for $4,,~ 302.52, with interest thereon from its date. The judgment was, at all times involved here, kept alive and effective.

Jake Chanowsky and Mary Chanowsky had been husband and wife for forty or more years when the judgment against the husband was obtained. Mary Oianowsky died on February 13, 1945; she left a will, by the terms of which she devised her property to her husband during his lifetime, with remainder to their son, Adolph Chanowsky; she named her son as independent executor of her estate. The will…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bednarz v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Stone v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. BynumTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McCasland v. HenwoodCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Warren v. HaverkornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of Herring, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
  2. Williams v. Bankers Fire and Marine Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1955
  3. Alamo Candy Company v. ZachariasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Mathews v. MathewsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
  5. Schneider Construction Co. v. Fraser Brick & Tile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API