Legal Opinion
Elliott v. Belt Automobile Ass'n
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 9, 1924PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrowne, J.
This is an action on an insurance policy-issued to M. Leo Elliott, plaintiff in error, by the Belt Automobile Indemnity Association.
The policy, as read by the ordinary person, would seem, among other things, to insure the owner of an automobile against liability for injuries to persons or property accidently inflicted by the owner, or by any member of his 'immediate family over 16 years of age. It is because the insurance company does not so regard its contract, that the case is here.
Under the title “LIABILITY,” there is a provision, “Against actual loss sustained by subscriber on account of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Patterson v. AdanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
- Connolly v. BolsterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Sanders v. Frankfort Marine, Accident & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1904
- Frye v. Bath Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1903
- National Surety Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Poole v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Cormier v. HudsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- DaCosta v. General Guaranty Ins. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Michel v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- The First National Bank of Miami v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.