Legal Opinion
Lee Polk v. Crown Auto, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided July 21, 2000No. 99-2204PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published per curiam opinion.
2Per curiam
On February 9, 1998, Lee Polk purchased a truck from Crown Auto. On March 10, 1998, he voluntarily returned it. Polk sued Crown Auto for various violations of the Truth-in-Lending Act (“TILA”) and of Virginia law arising out of the sale of the truck. Crown Auto filed a counterclaim for breach of contract. The district court granted summary judgment to Crown Auto on Polk’s claims and judgment to Crown Auto on the breach of contract claim. Polk now appeals the summary judgment on his claims. For the reasons below, we affirm.
I
Polk argues that Crown Auto…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Chrisom Polk v. Crown Auto, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Rachel Alston v. Crown Auto, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
4Cited by5 opinions
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Overlook, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Maple v. Colonial Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Maple)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- HILL v. CARVANA, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2022