Legal Opinion

Gibson Oil Co. v. Kelley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1934No. 23230PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action instituted in the district court of Tulsa county by the plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against the defendants in error, as defendants, and the parties will be referred to as they appeared in the lower court.

The plaintiff sought to recover damages from the defendants upon an injunction bond executed by the defendant Francis C. Kelley, as Roman Catholic Bishop of Oklahoma. as principal, and the defendants Thomas Chestnut and Chas. McKeever, as sureties thereon, which had been given in an action instituted by the said Francis C. Kelley, as Roman Catholic Bishop of Oklahoma,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. Galena Mining & Smelting Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  2. Bemis v. GannettNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Imo Oil & Gas Co. v. Chas. E. Knox Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. City of Bessemer v. DickensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Reddick v. Webb, Collins and KirbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. J. A. Preston Corp. v. Fabrication Enterprises, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Weaver v. BishopSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Union Oil Co. of California v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
  4. White v. Tulsa Iron & Metal Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Town of New Wilson v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API