Legal Opinion

City of Bessemer v. Dickens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 6, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Bessemer City Court. Heard before Hon. William Jackson. C. C. Dickens was acquitted of violating an ordinance of the city of Bessemer against engaging in or carrying on a business to do which a license was required, and the city appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

McCLELLAN, J. —

The appellee was, after his appeal from the mayor’s court, acquitted, upon trial in the city court without jury, of all alleged violation of an ordinance against engaging in or carrying on a business to do which a license was required.

The assignments of error insisted on are directed against the propriety of the court’s action in dischargingappellee. The judgment of the city court must be affirmed, since the bill of exceptions fails to show that a sale was made by appellee. — Abel’s Case, 90 Ala. 631, 8 South. 760. Mere preparation to engage in or carry on a business in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Abel v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alabama Power Co. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. National Surety Co. v. Citizens' Light, Heat & Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Town of Dadeville v. WynnAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Salmon v. SalmonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Gibson Oil Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API