Legal Opinion
Keller v. Greyhound Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 27, 1963PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGeorge W. Herz, J.
The plaintiff, Florence Keller, sues the defendant Ronald John Orbaczewski and two others in negligence to recover for personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident in New Jersey. Since the accident she has married the defendant Ronald John Orbaczewski and is now his wife. Said defendant moves for leave to serve a supplemental answer on the ground that the marriage occurred ‘ ‘ subsequent to the commencement of this action.” He seeks to plead, as an affirmative defense, that under the laws of the State of New Jersey the said plaintiff, presently being his wife, does not have a cause…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mertz v. MertzNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Stanford v. LinenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raisen v. RaisenSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Peters v. PetersHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Frances B. v. Mark B.New York Supreme Court · 1974
- Town Board of Fallsburgh v. National Surety Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1967
- Grafer v. Marko Beer & Beverages, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.